[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: new portmap packages, testers wanted



On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:52:19PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lun 19/01/2004 à 15:40, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> > If you feel that a listening portmap is such an unacceptable security
> > risk then have it accept only connections from localhost by default, and
> > ask admins to configure /etc/hosts.allow (like they are supposed to do
> > anyway).
> 
> And then you'll break all installed servers using NFS, NIS and so on
> upon upgrade.

I'd rather see this than the proposed behavior.  You can't have it both
ways... either you're trying to protect the desktop moron, or you're trying
to facilitate a server arrangement.

If the stated goal is to protect the desktop moron, then DO IT.  Configure
hosts.allow and hosts.deny to allow the portmapper to be protected from
anything other than a local address.  An administrator should be smart
enough to set things up properly if he needs something additional.

ANYTHING else is "more fragile".

-- 
 Marc Wilson |     "Those who believe in astrology are living in houses
 msw@cox.net |     with foundations of Silly Putty."  - Dennis Rawlins,
             |     astronomer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: