Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
From: Warren Turkal <wt@midsouth.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:59:08 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] bu4ais$6j0$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <[🔎] 1074016130.2107.310.camel@thanatos.hubertnet> <[🔎] bu2scf$fp1$2@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 87hdyyzj64.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net>

Henning Makholm wrote:

> AFAIU the (unwritten) policy is that the multiuser runlevels (2
> through 5) are avaliable for the local sysadmin to customize according
> to his own particular needs. If packages begin treating them
> differently, it may interfere with local customizations.

Maybe we should only reserve 7-9 for local customizations. Is there anyone
here who uses more than 3 levels of customization?

wt
-- 
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>

References:
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Thomas Hood <jdthood@yahoo.co.uk>
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Warren Turkal <wt@midsouth.rr.com>
- Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
  - From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [multiarch] Proposal for *-dev packages
Next by Date: Re: Sid is unusable
Previous by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Next by thread: Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread