Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:35:42PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 03:05, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > Uniform and prettier boot/init.d system with looks similiar to fedora with
> > possibly threaded(?) startup and logging as discussed during Debconf.
> Yeah, that's true. I don't mind personally, but some friends annoy me
> saying all time that Debian init scripts suck.
It definitelly sucks to erase the set of links and get them back after the
package is upgraded.
We need either the much discussed mechanism to avoid getting packages up from
a common config storage or a way to store the desired setting in a update-rc.d
related database, so that package upgrades that call the re-set of a link need
a -f (force) to re-create links that the root has disabled.
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.4.23|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
Don't "Sir" me young man, you have no idea who you're dealing with.
--Kay (Men in Black)