Re: Top 5 things that aren't in Debian but should be :-)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:35:42PM +0100, Isaac Clerencia wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 03:05, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > > Uniform and prettier boot/init.d system with looks similiar to fedora with
> > > possibly threaded(?) startup and logging as discussed during Debconf.
> >
> > Yeah, that's true. I don't mind personally, but some friends annoy me
> > saying all time that Debian init scripts suck.
>
> It definitelly sucks to erase the set of links and get them back after the
> package is upgraded.
>
> We need either the much discussed mechanism to avoid getting packages up from
> a common config storage or a way to store the desired setting in a update-rc.d
> related database, so that package upgrades that call the re-set of a link need
> a -f (force) to re-create links that the root has disabled.
You don't need a database for this; just leave at least one link (I usually
leave all of the K links).
--
- mdz
Reply to: