Re: Request for NMUs.
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 03:03:25PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Anthony Towns <email@example.com> writes:
> > On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 10:59:25AM +0000, Mark Howard wrote:
> >> Indeed, we are discouraged from making NMUs for non-RC issues.
> > Huh?
> This sounds as NMUs for non-RC issues are not accepted (and, in fact, i
> couldn't find a sponsor for such a NMU)
Oh, finding a sponsor is a different matter. But NMUs for non-RC issues
are generally okay, although aren't as urgent and can thus warrant taking a
bit more time.
Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004