[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Request for NMUs.

Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 10:59:25AM +0000, Mark Howard wrote:
>> Indeed, we are discouraged from making NMUs for non-RC issues. 
> Huh?

| During the release cycle (see Stable, testing, and unstable, Section
|, NMUs which fix serious or higher severity bugs are encouraged
| and accepted. 
[Developers Reference 5.11.3]

This sounds as NMUs for non-RC issues are not accepted (and, in fact, i
couldn't find a sponsor for such a NMU)

$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse   # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>

Reply to: