On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 01:04:30PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > I think that having > multiple developers involved in a package's life cycle is a GOOD thing, I agree - co-maintenance is a good thing. However, I think many of these NMUs for RC bugs are being done just to reduce the rc bug count - the NMUer just fixes an rc bug and ignores the other bugs. Indeed, we are discouraged from making NMUs for non-RC issues. > but there are plenty of valid > reasons for an NMU and no reason that a maintainer should need to upload > and confirm the NMU if there are no other bugs needing fixing. I agree - but looking through those nmus, how many do you think fall into this category? -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh@debian.org | mh@tildemh.com | mh344@cam.ac.uk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature