[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IMPORTANT: your message to html-tidy



on Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:57:58AM +0800, Cameron Patrick (cameron@patrick.wattle.id.au) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:17:22AM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> 
> | Running SA on modest HW with networking rules disabled can filter 20-40
> | messages/hr according to Dan Quinlan (SA developer, personal
> | conversation).
> 
> 20-40 messages per /HOUR/?  Spamassassin takes <1s to filter a message
> on my desktop, so presumably reasonably recent hardware should be able
> to manage 20-40 per minute...

Doh!

20-40/sec, in spamc/spamd configuration.

Though that seems generously high.  I think that's remembered right
though.

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    Defeat EU Software Patents!                         http://swpat.ffii.org/

Attachment: pgpwDwN7FJSQo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: