Hi,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >>Julien Blache wrote:
> >>>I was going for an NMU of xdrawchem, but g++ chokes on
> >>>xdrawchem/chemdata_rxn.cpp, eating memory until it gets killed...
> >>
> >>This is most likely a gcc bug. *sigh*. (These are really hard to track
> >>down.) Could you possibly try building it with g++ 3.4 prerelease and
> >>see if it still eats up memory? If so, I'm sure GCC upstream will be
> >>interested, so I'll try to make a cutdown testcase.
> >
> >#194345: g++ 3.3 needs to much memory / gets killed by OOM-killer
> >Package: gcc-3.3; Severity: important; Reported by: Rene Engelhard
> ><rene@debian.org>; Tags: sid, upstream; merged with #194513; 222 days
> >old.
> >
> >Grüße/Regards,
> >
> >René
>
> Unfortunately, most GCC memory explosion bugs are DIFFERENT from each
> other. What makes you think the xdrawchem one is the same as the
> openoffice one?
If you actually read the bug you would have seen that MANY packages
have that problem, just not openoffice.org.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature