Re: apt 0.6 in experimental
On Tuesday 30 December 2003 18:53, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 09:54:58AM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> > On Tuesday 30 December 2003 02:27, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:26:28AM +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> > > > #81829 and here is what Jason says:
> > >
> > > That is a different bug.
> > hm, that is not about 'Release file not copied if local' issue, that is
> > about people's reporting 'zsh: segmentation fault' ... I do not think it
> > is different, and I do not think it is an apt bug. Still not sure if
> > these /var/ cache/apt/*.bin files are deleted automatically before any
> > apt-get command.
> The segfault that people were seeing with 0.6.4 is not the same as the
> segfault described in #81829 and its many duplicates (which is that apt can
> crash if the cache .bin files are corrupted).
again, # 81829 (& dups) says 2 things:
* corrupted *.bin files
* broken libstdc++
> If you were seeing segfaults with 0.6.4, please try 0.6.6.
apt 0.6.6 (and apt 0.6.4) does NOT segfault here... on various operation (and
I think I know how to stress it;). All I can suspect is broken *.bin files
(these might be check on loading or removed automatically every single time
when apt program is called) and/or libstdc++ on people's systems it
versions of depends here:
question: Does latest apt remove those *.bin files every time apt <command> is
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <keyserver.bu.edu>
1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB