Re: dpkg-sig: sign binary debian archive files

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* George Danchev (danchev@spnet.net) [031229 16:10]:
> On Monday 29 December 2003 14:56, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Well, policy is IMHO not the right place, but I started with
> > http://dpkg-sig.turmzimmer.net/faq.html and put there snippets from
> > this thread.

> Thanks. That will help to clear up the situation.

> I suggest to split out the 
> paragraph of "When and if dpkg-sig is liked and accepted by the community, 
> than the next changes ..." into separate one named something like "Other 
> packages to change" [...]

Thanks, done.

> Hm, shouldn't dpkg-sig Depend: on devscripts now?

Why?


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C