Re: dpkg-sig: sign binary debian archive files
* George Danchev (email@example.com) [031229 16:10]:
> On Monday 29 December 2003 14:56, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Well, policy is IMHO not the right place, but I started with
> > http://dpkg-sig.turmzimmer.net/faq.html and put there snippets from
> > this thread.
> Thanks. That will help to clear up the situation.
> I suggest to split out the
> paragraph of "When and if dpkg-sig is liked and accepted by the community,
> than the next changes ..." into separate one named something like "Other
> packages to change" [...]
> Hm, shouldn't dpkg-sig Depend: on devscripts now?
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C