[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: BTS and maintainer changes

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Colin Watson wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > How quickly is a change of maintainer supposed to propagate to the BTS?
> >
> > I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated
> > control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several
> > days. I have checked that I am correctly listed as maintainer in
> > the unstable Sources file and in
> > http://ftp.debian.org/indices/Maintainers{,.gz}.
> >
> > Nevertheless, the BTS persists in giving the QA group as the maintainer
> > at, say, <http://bugs.debian.org/src:autotrace>. I am worried that
> > this might mean that I am not notified of bug activity by email.
> The update of the Maintainers file is triggered by an ftpsync from
> ftp-master, which evidently hasn't been happening. ftpmaster, do we need
> to set up new ssh keys or something, or are ftpsyncs just disabled for
> the meantime?

ftpmaster on auric did a ssh pulse to my account on master originally, then
that was moved to the debbugs account.

We need to get a new ssh private/public key generated, and have ftpmaster use
that to pulse us.

(for both auric and samosa)

Reply to: