Re: BTS (Normal and Important) -- more issues?
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 06:32:01PM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:22:57PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Fixed now.
>
> earlier today i submitted a bug against an orphaned package in wnpp,
> and haven't yet recieved a reply. normally the replies come back pretty
> quick (like 5 or 10 minutes max), but in this case it's been over 4
> hours now... maybe the message wasn't delivered when the disks filled
> up on bts? is it still queued? ack... b.d.o doesn't seem to be
> responding to http requests now, so i'm guessing something's up (and
> that someone's probably already working on it :)
It responds fine to HTTP for me.
> if it's helpful at all, here's some info:
>
> bug #196199
> sent at Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:28:45 -0500
>
> and here's the relevent line from my postfix logs:
>
> Dec 16 15:28:46 sativa postfix/smtp[3894]: 70ECA15834: to=<196199@bugs.debian.org>, relay=master.debian.org[146.82.138.7], delay=1, status=sent (250 OK id=1AWLoE-0007ok-00)
>
>
> should i re-send the message, or am i just being too impatient?
I don't see it in the bugs.debian.org logs at all, so I guess it must
still be queued in exim somewhere (which I don't have privileges to
check). It'll try to check further and get back to you.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: