On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:14:45PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > I don't understand why it's been "invalidated by dependency" while "at least
> > one of mozilla-browser (>= 2:1.1.0) | mozilla-firebird |
> > mozilla-browser-snapshot can be satisfied however."
> mozilla-firebird is in testing of all these three packages.
I'd expect that's not the case for all architectures, though, given:
Package has a Depends on mozilla-browser-snapshot which cannot be
satisfied on mipsel. At least one of mozilla-browser (>= 2:1.1.0) |
mozilla-firebird | mozilla-browser-snapshot can be satisfied however.
Given there's also:
Package has a Depends on mozilla-firebird which cannot be satisfied on
mipsel. At least one of mozilla-browser (>= 2:1.1.0) |
mozilla-firebird | mozilla-browser-snapshot can be satisfied however.
I'd expect that the only one of those which is satisfiable is the mozilla
dependency, which isn't available at that version in testing.
> Looks like a bug.
Pretty unlikely.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
pgpfeS79IK80K.pgp
Description: PGP signature