[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:39:23AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Not woody, but woody's kernels. I see no serious reasons to have an
> up-to-date kernel added to woody. In potato's days there were
> major updates for kernels and boot-floppies kernels.

Oh, well :) I meant _to have NOT_ of course!

Francesco P. Lovergine

Reply to: