Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:06:18AM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> This problem has caused much more time to be spent on this than what
> would have been needed, for no other reason than "woody is outdated".
Not woody, but woody's kernels. I see no serious reasons to have an
up-to-date kernel added to woody. In potato's days there were
major updates for kernels and boot-floppies kernels.
But for that, there are not great problems in using woody for a server.
Workstation use is a complete different story.
IMHO we should consider to update woody kernels ASAP.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: