[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Circular Build-Depends; am I their only enemy?



On Nov 1, 2003, at 11:43, Scott James Remnant wrote:

Strangely enough, *I* know that.

I interpreted his "starting with" as being the set of packages you start
building from source.

That's not how I intended it. I'm particularly interested in making backporting from unstable to stable easier; but any other thing --- like bootstrapping new archs --- where you have to rebuild the world would be greatly aided.


And frankly, I don't see why build-essential packages should be special
in this way.

For many of the reasons that Essential packages are special. You don't need to list Build-Essential packages in your Build-Depends (generally) for example. And you can't build squat without them.

 I can immediately think of several "make replacement"
packages (ant, for example) that use themselves to build themselves.

Please read <http://ant.apache.org/manual-1.6beta/install.html#buildingant> where you will learn that Ant does not need Ant to build.



Reply to: