On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:34:19AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > I can't see how you can say this while "agreeing" with me. If we only > > put artificially built packages in testing, then we are *not* testing > > packages built in a real-world environment, so we have no real idea > > how well they work. > > Maybe because my English is not native and I fail to understand some > convoluted constructs? :) > > We *ARE* testing everything. If a package cannot be correctly built, > in the rare case where this is not detected at build time, will fail > miserably at its users - in Unstable or in Testing. It can't be. Your argument is that the package will not be put into unstable or testing - instead, only packages build on artificial systems will be. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature