Re: Bug#215205: language-chooser: Language order shouldn't be alphabetical
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:18:46PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> > I would suggest adopting a policy for the language order. Of course,
> > determining the "most important" languages is a very delicate thing as
> > everyone would like to have his own language listed on the first page.
If you could get the Timezone first, you might have a group of the
three or four most common languages in that timezone followed by
the full alphabetic list. So US Eastern time would have English, Spanish
and Portuguese as the top three, while GMT+1 would perhaps have
French, German, Arabic and perhaps a major south of the Sahara language.