On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:31, Steve Langasek wrote: > On the shared library side, we already have the NEEDED field in ELF libs > which is more elegant; so the .la's are redundant (and, indeed, can get > in the way). I understand Scott is working on fixing libtool so that it > doesn't try to redundantly link applications when running on systems > that have the required support. > Indeed, the patch works perfectly as far as I can tell for shared libraries and programs ... I'm currently in the phase of making sure I didn't break static libraries. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part