[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hardcoding of .la file paths in .la files

On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:31, Steve Langasek wrote:

> On the shared library side, we already have the NEEDED field in ELF libs
> which is more elegant; so the .la's are redundant (and, indeed, can get
> in the way).  I understand Scott is working on fixing libtool so that it
> doesn't try to redundantly link applications when running on systems
> that have the required support.
Indeed, the patch works perfectly as far as I can tell for shared
libraries and programs ... I'm currently in the phase of making sure I
didn't break static libraries.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: