also sprach Adam Borowski <kilobyte@mimuw.edu.pl> [2003.09.28.0744 +0200]: > Well... as 2.6 is coming out really soon, ipsec is in a lot better > position than grsec. Also, you will _have_ to port grsec to 2.6 (or > abandon it), and 2.6 will have ipsec in the upstream sources. The only > difference lies in needing to do the porting work a bit sooner. Bollocks. I am the Debian maintainer, I won't do any porting. grsecurity will support the 2.6 kernel series when it is released. Then I will port the new patches to Debian. Then, the problem will be fixed. However, I still don't think that this closes the issue. I think feature backports to the kernel-source packages should not happen! How do y'all suggest we continue on this, because apparently there are two camps with different opinions, Herbert doesn't think he needs to do anything, and this issue will just die without a change happening. I think we have to properly address and close the whole thing! -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
pgpxzQvdfrquD.pgp
Description: PGP signature