[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: To what extent should Debian modify the kernel? (Re: Debian should not modify the kernels!)

On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:30:28PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:

> Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> > 
> > So, I'm curious why you chose to make it a part of the Debian kernel source,
> > rather than a separate patch (kernel-patch-ipsec or such).
> Well the reason for it to be in the default kernel-source is simple:
> The patch should be used on all default Debian kernel images unless
> the arch maintainer chooses to override it.

But what are the criteria for what should be used on all default Debian
kernel images?  You seem to address this below...

> > I suppose the more fundamental question is, what is your vision for the
> > Debian kernel source?  What do you feel belongs there, and what does not?
> Perhaps vision is too strong a word.
> I have some simple checks when it comes to patch inclusion:
> * Is it actively maintained by someone?
>   If it's not maintained then there is very little chance for me to
>   include it as I have no time in fixing random breakages.
> * If it's a feature, can it be disabled/enabled at runtime?
>   Sinec we're making generic kernels, this is a must.  The presence
>   of the patch should not prevent me from doing something that I would
>   otherwise be able to do.
>   If the patch only produces a module then it obviously passes this test.
> * If it's a bug fix, how bad are its side-effects?
>   I'm not going to accept any bug fix that makes the kernel better for
>   10% of the users but worse for the other 90%.
> * What size impact does it have to the binary kernel image?
>   This is very important for the debian-boot team.
>   Again it would be best if it was completely modularised.

OK, these are very minimal criteria, and I think that probably many of the
kernel-patch packages in Debian would fit them.  Where would you draw the

I currently patch my kernels with device-mapper, a few evms-related patches
and skas3.  It would be very convenient if device-mapper and the evms
patches could be included in the the stock kernel; then users could use EVMS
or LVM2 in stock kernel images.  This is especially useful in the installer

 - mdz

Reply to: