Re: installer for non-free packages in contrib
Colin Watson <email@example.com> a tapoté :
> * When did I say that I thought contrib installers for non-free
> software were OK? I've just looked back through this thread and the
> previous one on the same subject and I can't find any such statement
> from me. For the record, I think they pass the letter of Debian
> policy and don't deserve release-critical bugs, but they seem to be
> a bit of a hacky workaround, and I think it'd probably be more
> honest if we put them in non-free. If you're going to argue with me,
> at least have the basic decency to argue with *me*, not somebody
So finally now you answered about the theorical proposal I made at
first (I asked to put these packages in non-free or to force the
installer to build the proper package).
Is there anybody else that thinks too that these packages belongs to
non-free / think that the installer should build a proper package?
Not a native english speaker: