On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 09:28:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I agree if the FTBFS comes from something the NMUer did, then yes, it is
> broken, but if it comes from general bad shape of the packages, then the
> responsability is to the package maintainer
It's fine that you disagree. You're welcome to that. If you're going to
act on your opinions though -- and not take responsibility for fixing
the new bugs found when you upload NMUs -- then please do not NMU.
Again: this isn't about finding fault, it's about taking responsibility
for the quality of your NMUs, and making sure that *all* new problems
are resolved whether you caused them or not.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Is this some kind of psych test?
Am I getting paid for this?''
Attachment:
pgpYnDkKVLDUs.pgp
Description: PGP signature