On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:53:52AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> writes: > > [Goswin von Brederlow] > > > So we have to go through the "waiting for the maintainer not to > > > reply, finding a sponsor, waiting for the delayed NMU to go through" > > > cycle for every single one line bugfix instead of doing one NMU that > > > will fix 20 bugs in one go? > > It is OK to fix several bugs at once in one NMU. > He (you forgot his quote) said he wouldn't Sponsor an NMU but just > bugs in the BTS. And what in that comment, pray, leads you to think that I would be uploading NMUs to fix one bug at a time? Do you automatically assume that DDs will do things in the least logical way possible? If there are multiple bugs in the BTS, with patches, for a package that needs an NMU, I'm not going to go to the trouble of NMUing at someone else's request and then only fix one bug at a time. Do not Cc: me; I am subscribed to the list. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpr8CkFbyWF8.pgp
Description: PGP signature