On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 09:17:05AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > So your intention is to hijack the package. Then cut the crap about > being a "co-maintainer" if you have no intention of working together > with the existing maintainer. If the package needs to be hijacked due > to maintainer inactivity, you should honestly present this as your > reason for requesting sponsorship instead of trying to be named a > co-maintainer of a package whose maintainer is MIA. Perhaps the underlying motive is that the new 'co-maintainer' won't have the finger pointed at him so often when stuff breaks :) -- Joshua Kwan
Attachment:
pgpCpORysGrHC.pgp
Description: PGP signature