Re: Bug#204658: ITP: develock -- additional font-lock keywords for the developers
Am 12.08.03 um 14:32:54 schrieb OHASHI Akira:
> But the `-el' suffix looks redundant for me. Because I can know that
> it is an Emacs specific package, if I see it's description and
> dependency.
The description didn't say it was an Emacs package, and I don't see the
dependencies until I hit the install button. Even then, since Emacs is
installed, dependencies are fulfilled and everything installs fine, only
that I can't use it from within Vim.
> And the software which I got interested and ITPed is identified by the
> name of `develock', not `develock-el'.
This seems a fairly small change to me. Consider lib-saxon-java, which
is as ugly a name as is possible.[1]
Bye,
Mike
[1] And also completely wrong IMHO. As a user of an XSLT processor, I
don't care the least that it is written in Java. But this is OT.
--
|=| Michael Piefel
|=| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
|=| Tel. (+49 30) 2093 3831
Reply to: