Re: Bug#204658: ITP: develock -- additional font-lock keywords for the developers
>>>>> In <[🔎] 20030811112803.GA2431@kosh.informatik.hu-berlin.de>
>>>>> Michael Piefel <piefel@debian.org> wrote:
> > Would it make sense to call the package something like "emacs-develock"
> > to make it obvious that it is Emacs specific?
>
> Absolutely, I think. Just as the vim packages have their vim prefix.
I don't know that there is such a rule for naming convention of
package name. If it is common sense of Debian, we should write in a
policy manual clearly.
If it must surely rename, I choose `develock-el'. But the `-el' suffix
looks redundant for me. Because I can know that it is an Emacs
specific package, if I see it's description and dependency. And the
software which I got interested and ITPed is identified by the name of
`develock', not `develock-el'.
--
OHASHI Akira
bg66@debian.org bg66@koka-in.org
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Reply to: