Re: better make a standard for /etc//_not_to_be_run

Bernd Eckenfels:

So: this is neighter common for linux nor the right usage of the dir.

Oh. I just picked up the practice from the other packages that did this.Maybe I should change it (lyskom-server), then?


--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/

 I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.

Reply to:

References:
- better make a standard for /etc/*/*_not_to_be_run
  - From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
- Re: better make a standard for /etc/*/*_not_to_be_run
  - From: Emile van Bergen <emile-deb@evbergen.xs4all.nl>
- Re: better make a standard for /etc/*/*_not_to_be_run
  - From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists@lina.inka.de>
- Re: better make a standard for /etc/*/*_not_to_be_run
  - From: Peter Karlsson <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
- Re: better make a standard for /etc/*/*_not_to_be_run
  - From: Bernd Eckenfels <lists@lina.inka.de>

Re: better make a standard for /etc/*/*_not_to_be_run