Re: Should this be filed as grave? Gcc-2.95
I demand that Joe Wreschnig may or may not have written...
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:48, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>>> You asked for gcc-2.95. You got gcc-2.95. Whatever else you got should be
>>> of no consequence whatsoever.
>> It's this kind of attitude that drives people to gentoo.
> Let them go. IMO it's far better to install more than is necessary, but
> always get the desired functionality, than install less than is desired,
> and then have to spend 20 hours recompiling for the necessary
> functionality.
> For most people, disks are cheap. Time isn't.
Just out of interest, what are your assumptions wrt costs associated with
downloading?
--
| Darren Salt | linux (or ds) at | nr. Ashington,
| woody, sarge, | youmustbejoking | Northumberland
| RISC OS | demon co uk | Toon Army
| <URL:http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/> (PGP 2.6, GPG keys)
The only way to make something foolproof is to keep it away from fools.
Reply to: