On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 23:37:32 -0400
Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> What you meant to do was to run "make CC=gcc-2.95" instead of make. There
> is no need to futz around with the default gcc version; just ask for what
> you want.
Uh, no. I am aware of that. That, however, did not prevent it from
running the wrong GCC. v2.4.21 of the kernel had a problem with 3.3. It
would die repeatedly on the same line in ide-cd.h. I did tell make to use
gcc-2.95 and it failed on the exact same line. Removing gcc, which is 3.3,
gcc-2.95 which depended on 3.3 (this is NOT 2.95 in my eyes) and then
installing the packages from woody did allow me to recompile that version of
the kernel.
I fail to see how 2.95 installing 3.3 somehow equates to 2.95.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
| -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpBQXZTE6EtR.pgp
Description: PGP signature