Re: 469 packages still using dh_undocumented, check if one is yours
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 08:51:27PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Bernd Eckenfels <email@example.com> writes:
> > On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > > Could the dh_undocumented programm allways fail with an error "Don't
> > > use me" as the next step? That way all new uploads will be forced to
> > > care.
> > this will still create fail to build bugs for no good reason.
> Some sort of "Hey you, your doing something wrong but I will let is
> pass this time" feedback from autobuilder would be nice together with
> keeping such nearly broken packages out of testing (to give some
> incentive for mainatiner to fix the problem).
They are *not* "nearly broken". They are just out of date by a few
months. Why this urge to break compatibility? What useful purpose does
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]