Re: Proposed handling of generated configuration files (Re: stop the "manage with debconf" madness)
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 02:45:32AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hmm. ucf does show the user the changes, and even offers to
> merge maintainer changes into the current configuration file.
> What functionality do you think ucf is missing?
In my first message, I listed bullet points for goals, most of which ucf
meets, and then outlined the problems with this model, and linked to
previous threads discussing them in detail.