libvorbis0a (Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age)
Considering the libvorbis case, what needs to happen is the
remaining packages that depend on libvorbis0 be recompiled
against libvorbis0a.
Then, optionally, remove the packages from testing.
I would have thought that libvorbis0 and dependent packages merit a removal
from testing because woody->sarge partial upgrades will break if these
packages are released. (isn't that the whole reason for libvorbis0a?)
regards,
junichi
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Paul Hampson <Paul.Hampson@anu.edu.au>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Paul Hampson <Paul.Hampson@anu.edu.au>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
- From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>