Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age
On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:05:52PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > depth, i cannot help all that much about it, and libvorbis is a valid
> > > > candidate, but his installation would break 107 or so packages in
> > > > testing, and i have not really the intention to check by hand all those
> > > > 107 packages. I believe it is just some packages that need to be rebuilt
> > > > due to the libvorbis0a thingy, not sure though. I already checked the
> > > > primary dependencies of all our packages (around 40) by hand, which
> > >
> > > apt-cache showpkg libvorbis0 prints out just a couple of packages. Is
> >
> > You have to look at the update_output.txt file, it shows :
>
> > * alpha: adonthell, alsaplayer, alsaplayer-alsa, alsaplayer-common,
> [...]
>
> But these are also packages wich depend implicitely on libvorbis0,
> right?
I suppose so, not sure though, as i have not checked in detail.
> For example:
> blackbird:~/tum/tum/ac1/report$ apt-cache show race | grep Depends
> Depends: race-data (>= 0.7.0-5), clanlib2 (>= 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-gl (>=
> 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-gui (>= 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-jpeg (>= 0.6.2-1),
> clanlib2-png (>= 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-sound (>= 0.6.2-1), clanlib2-vorbis
> (>= 0.6.2-1), libc6 (>= 2.2.5-13), libpng3, libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 (>=
> 1:2.95.4-0.010810), xlibmesa3 | libgl1, zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4)
>
> clanlib2-vorbis probably depends on libvorbis0.
Yes, and clanlib2-vorbis doesn't exist in sid anymore, but only
libclan2-vorbis.
> I guess wo only have to rebuild first-level dependencies, or am I
> mistaken?
You would have to rebuild all first-level dependencies, yes, and hope
that those rebuilds don't introduce other bumped dependencies that have
problems with testing.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: