Re: Familiar packages
On Sun, 6 Apr 2003 07:59, James Troup wrote:
> Russell Coker <email@example.com> writes:
> > So I guess that it can't go into main without source, but it should
> > be eligible for non-free or contrib.
> Err, no way. GPL with no source means non-distributable.
The source is available. I can give the details of the CVS etc. But making
the source all available with the package is rather painful (someone else has
done the compilation etc).
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page