Re: standard for executable files under /usr/share
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 07:52:48 -0800, Joshua M. Kwan wrote:
> Sven Luther said:
> > Why not simply /usr/share/bin ?
> This is a great idea. It makes a lot of sense for stuff like perl scripts
> and python scripts which really are arch independent. Is it time to think
> about FHS again?
Namespace-wise /usr/share/bin doesn't really sound like a great idea
Michał Politowski -- email@example.com
Warning: this is a memetically modified message