Re: standard for executable files under /usr/share

To: "Sven Luther" <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: "Debian Devel" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: standard for executable files under /usr/share
From: "Joshua M. Kwan" <joshk@triplehelix.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 07:52:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 12786.207.82.33.11.1048002768.squirrel@mail.triplehelix.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030318115030.GA8644@iliana>
References: <[🔎] 200303181223.45080.russell@coker.com.au> <[🔎] 20030318115030.GA8644@iliana>

Sven Luther said:

> Why not simply /usr/share/bin ?

This is a great idea. It makes a lot of sense for stuff like perl scripts
and python scripts which really are arch independent. Is it time to think
about FHS again?

Regards,
Josh

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: standard for executable files under /usr/share
  - From: Michał Politowski <mpol@charybda.icm.edu.pl>

References:
- standard for executable files under /usr/share
  - From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
- Re: standard for executable files under /usr/share
  - From: Sven Luther <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: potato packages in unstable?
Next by Date: Re: [desktop] Installation of mail server by default
Previous by thread: Re: standard for executable files under /usr/share
Next by thread: Re: standard for executable files under /usr/share
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread