Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 05:38, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Providing such a guarantee is the point of standardizing on /run (and
> leaving the implementation details -- physical vs. in-memory -- to the
> local admin).
If a consensus is emerging that /run is needed, what's the next
step? Amending policy to allow for the directory (currently
forbidden by FHS)?
Thomas Hood <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts