Re: "testing" improvements
Jérôme Marant <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I'm sorry but most people that want recent versions of packages
> in a more stable state use testing, not unstable. These are facts,
> not theory. Since, testing is a pre-stable release it has to be
> tested even more than unstable, because what's going to be on CDs
> is testing not unstable.
Because testing has been basically frozen for some months it doesn't
hold "recent versions of packages".
These people currently use stable+backports. - Usually they are happy
with http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/packages/ combined with either KDE3.1
This also what I recommend on debian-user-german or in Usenet, I
always warn them about the dangers of Pinning and the missing security
updates for testing.