On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:09:02AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote: > Huh? The DSFG is about *licenses*. The question whether a *program* is > DSFG-free simply makes no sense. The Term DSFG-free does not make any sense to me, either. What i was referring to was Point 5 of the DFSG: <http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines> | No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups | | The license must not discriminate against any person or group of | persons. Some people might feel that the "easter egg" is discriminating against a group of people, namely Debian Users. I do not feel so (since the License still is "free" and the code could both have been avoided by a single define and be removed easily), however i do not feel that iam in a position to judge about that. I do find myself only in the position to bring up my opinion. -rg -- | Rico -mc- Gloeckner | mv ~/.signature `finger mc@ukeer.de`
Attachment:
pgpFHQ60K4D3I.pgp
Description: PGP signature