[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for removal of mICQ package

>>>>> In article <[🔎] 20030214080010.GA11005@evbergen.xs4all.nl>, Emile van Bergen <emile-deb@evbergen.xs4all.nl> writes:

 > Let's judge the offence at hand and not speculate about the
 > perpetrators mind set and the possible future much worse offenses
 > resulting from that.

 > This sounds *way* to much like "Sure he wasn't guilty of /that/,
 > but I'm estaaablishing a pettern of behaaaviour here, y'r honor".

	Fine. This particular cracker hid a poison pill in the
 program, which would attempt to evade developer checks, and, at a
 point in time, trigger to deny the use the services of the
 program. Denial of services trojan, rahter cleverly
 disguised. Still, the upstream is a cracker, and next time, he'll do

Old MacDonald had an agricultural real estate tax abatement.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: