On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:44:27PM -0500, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Gabucino wrote: > > > It's highly likely that there are other license and copyright irregularities > > > in the codebase as well.[1] > > I can only repeat what I wrote in my previous mail: you came to this > > conclusiong because you haven't found a pretty little Changelog in > > libmpeg2/ ? > > No, I came to this _suspicion_ because it took me 5 minutes or less to > find a licensing irregularity in the mplayer codebase. Maybe I just > have a knack for finding them, but you would have expected the mplayer > developers to have known about such a trivial problem and fixed it if > they were at all cognizant of licensing and copyright issues. > > I'm pretty sure Andrew Suffield could fill us all in on quite a few > more. I haven't been keeping track lately, I gave up on mplayer as a lost cause many months ago. Now it's just a cause of occasional amusement when somebody wakes up one of the ITP threads, and then kills it again with a mail along the lines of "Still more licensing issues, here we go again...". -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing, `. `' | Imperial College, `- -><- | London, UK
Attachment:
pgphUkld4R6n9.pgp
Description: PGP signature