On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Gabucino wrote: > > It's highly likely that there are other license and copyright irregularities > > in the codebase as well.[1] > I can only repeat what I wrote in my previous mail: you came to this > conclusiong because you haven't found a pretty little Changelog in > libmpeg2/ ? No, I came to this _suspicion_ because it took me 5 minutes or less to find a licensing irregularity in the mplayer codebase. Maybe I just have a knack for finding them, but you would have expected the mplayer developers to have known about such a trivial problem and fixed it if they were at all cognizant of licensing and copyright issues. I'm pretty sure Andrew Suffield could fill us all in on quite a few more. > for i in *; do echo "/* file modified */" > $i; done The fact that it was modified, the date it was modified, and the person doing the modification. Additionally, I believe you mean '>> $i'. Including the appropriate changelog, AUTHORS, COPYRIGHT, and/or README is also a good idea. > That's about all the change that took place in it. :) Considering all of the portions of libmpeg2 that are commented out, I highly doubt it. No one makes a library with header files that are that commented out. [At least, I hope no one is...] Don Armstrong -- She was alot like starbucks. IE, generic and expensive. -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/batch3.htm http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
pgpWckqpyK1DR.pgp
Description: PGP signature