[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: C++ transition stumbling blocks?

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 05:00:42PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>     * Some time ago I splitted libGLU off the mesa packages because it
>       really makes more sense so.  All the binary packages depend on the
>       new libglu1 package in order to satisfy the virtual package
>       requirements.  The reason for this is that in the future there are
>       going to be _more_ mesa packages (at least one more).

I personally would appreciate it if you renamed Mesa's libglu1 (and
libglu-dev) so that libglu1 and libglu-dev can be pure virtual packages.

However, this isn't required by any means.

G. Branden Robinson                |     You are not angry with people when
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     you laugh at them. Humor teaches
branden@debian.org                 |     them tolerance.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- W. Somerset Maugham

Attachment: pgpr98ql1xaux.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: