[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc 3.2 not faster

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:22, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:38:04 +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I thought that gcc 3.2 was supposed to be faster, however I have just
> > done some benchmarks to show the opposite:
> Could you provide details please of the operating conditions
> under which these tests were performed? e.g. if you used single
> user mode, etc.

I did not use single-user mode.  But I ran the tests a couple of times and got 
the same results, when the difference is so great and it's repeatable there 
isn't any need to go to single-user-mode for absolute accuracy.

Anyway you've got the source, feel free to repeat the tests however you wish.

http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

Reply to: