Re: gcc 3.2 not faster
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 21:22, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:38:04 +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I thought that gcc 3.2 was supposed to be faster, however I have just
> > done some benchmarks to show the opposite:
> Could you provide details please of the operating conditions
> under which these tests were performed? e.g. if you used single
> user mode, etc.
I did not use single-user mode. But I ran the tests a couple of times and got
the same results, when the difference is so great and it's repeatable there
isn't any need to go to single-user-mode for absolute accuracy.
Anyway you've got the source, feel free to repeat the tests however you wish.
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page