[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc 3.2 not faster

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 20:34, Jack Howarth wrote:
>    I recall reading somewhere on the gcc mailing list that
> the threshold they are trying to meet currently is for
> gcc 3.x to be less than 15% slower than gcc 2.95.4. I can't
> recall if that was for 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3.

Well my tests indicate that in some situations they didn't meet that goal.

http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

Reply to: