[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc 3.2 not faster



On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:38:04 +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> I thought that gcc 3.2 was supposed to be faster, however I have just done 
> some benchmarks to show the opposite:

Could you provide details please of the operating conditions 
under which these tests were performed? e.g. if you used single 
user mode, etc.

-- 
Jon Dowland



Reply to: