On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:34:19AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 04:41:45PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 03:07:47PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 07:46:20PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > > > > Debian's support for so many arches slows down development in other > > > > areas as well. For example, getting gcc-3.2 working on all arches has [...] > > > > > the key issue. We have one outstanding issue with gcc-3.2 at the moment, > > > which is that cmath on sparc doesn't work. > > > > Something is seriously wrong, if a single bug that affects a single > > arch can stop everyone else from forward. > > You obviously didn't read all of aj's message. How about you postpone > your bitching along these lines until you've helped fix all the RC bugs > in gcc 3.2 and glibc 2.3.1 that *do* affect i386? Not to defend Riku here, but I would point out that a mechanism to shunt very buggy packages into experimental and replace them with a previous known working version from snapshots would be a very useful thing, and would have severely cut back on the amount of damage caused by things like the recent libc6 transition. And no, I don't have the skill or the time to write such a mechanism. Please don't suggest that that removes any validity or value of the suggestion. -- Zed Pobre <zed@debian.org> a.k.a. Zed Pobre <zed@resonant.org> PGP key and fingerprint available on finger; encrypted mail welcomed.
Attachment:
pgpjLYruD1d1u.pgp
Description: PGP signature