Re: Discussion - non-free software removal
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:48:21PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> This is a misstatement. There won't be a few lines to change;
> there may not be a replacement; or gathering the list may be a
> serious effort.
It seems that with all the obvious interest in this, and the number of
people we have around that have well-connected high-powered machines to
offer, that it would be more unlikely that no replacement would appear.
> If you find a place for all he non-free software, and thus
> make your statement actually true; (instead of a mere sophist device
> to gloss over the problems), things shall be different.
I don't think that it's accurate to assume from the start that the statement
is false or likely to be false.